March 5 to 9
- The Auschwitz complex The Economist – 06/03/2012
Mr Netanyahu thinks the Zionist mission was to give the Jewish people control over their destiny. No people has control over its destiny when it is at war with its neighbours. But in any case, that is only one way of thinking of the Zionist mission. Another mission frequently cited by early Zionists was to help Jews grow out of the « Ghetto mentality ». Mr Netanyahu’s gift to Mr Obama shows he’s still in it.
- Egypt: the struggle of a woman against torture (Egypte: le combat d’une femme contre la torture) Le Figaro – 07/03/2012
Arrested by the army in Tahrir Square, Samira Ibrahim suffered torture in prison and a « virginity test ». Since then she seeks for justice. If she chose the courts for legal redress, Samira Ibrahim expects nothing from the current political forces, guilty, she said, of using women as a weapon to silence society as a whole.
- Hamas is making a tactical appeal to the grassroots the Guardian – 08/03/2012
Instead of declaring itself Iran’s proxy, the movement is aligning with the democratic rise of ‘moderate’ Islamic politics. Historically, Hamas has always gone to great lengths to assert its independence from any foreign influence. It is widely recognised that it receives support from powers such as Syria (until recently) and Iran. Yet this has never been worn as a badge of honour by the movement.
- Opposition to the Syrian Opposition: Against the Syrian National Council Jadaliyya – 08/03/2012
The Syrian people are now left to be victims but also bystanders. The SNC and its allies have allowed the Syrian cause to become an agenda in the foreign policies of such reactionary regimes as Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, and Bahrain. The US and Israel are now engaged in a war that has nothing to do with the aspirations and desires of the Syrian people. The SNC is now on the side of the US and Israel in their plots against Syria.
- The Kingdom Divided Sada – 08/03/2012
Saudi Arabia’s “day of rage” planned for last March failed to gain ground, and protests concentrated in the Eastern Province fell short of producing a national consensus around demands for political reform. The country’s domestic stability has been attributed to a combination of three factors: the regime’s ability to rely on an influx of oil reserves to buy-off political unrest, its domestic alliance with a conservative religious establishment and powerful tribal groups as a means of dividing and controlling sources of dissent, and the long-standing support of Western powers for external security.